www.CAcleanAction.org

Councilmember Evan Low scored 100% on the Clean Money questionnaire

His opponent, Councilmember Chuck Page, scored 100%.

They are running for Assembly District 28, which includes the cities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, San Jose, and Saratoga.

The California Clean Money Action Fund asked all candidates for state office in California to answer six questions about whether they support legislation for more disclosure on political ads and public financing of campaigns.

Overall Score.

Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Overall Score: 100% Overall Score: 100%

The overall score on the survey is determined by the answers on the first five questions. For every “Yes”, the candidate gets 20%, for every “No” they get 0%. An answer of “Other” gets 10% unless it’s clear from their explanation that the candidate would or would not support the legislation.

Q1. Do you support legislation requiring ballot measure ads to clearly state their three largest true individual, corporate or union funders instead of committee names, even if the funds are transferred through one or more intermediary committees or organizations?
Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Answer: "Yes"
Answer: "Yes"

"I don't think it should be limited to the largest 3. There should be a website where ALL donors should be identified should I want to find them."

Q2. Do you support legislation requiring independent ads for and against candidates to clearly state their three largest true individual, corporate or union funders instead of committee names, even if the funds are transferred through one or more intermediary committees or organizations?
Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Answer: "Yes"
Answer: "Yes"
Q3. Would you support legislation described in questions 1 and 2 if your constituents were clearly in favor of it while major campaign funders opposed it?
Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Answer: "Yes"
Answer: "Yes"
Q4. Do you support legislation requiring state and local candidates to stand by their political ads, saying in those ads that they “approve this message” as federal candidates must?
Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Answer: "Yes"
Answer: "Yes"
Q5. Do you support legislation providing competitive amounts of public financing or small donor matching funds to campaigns of qualified candidates who demonstrate a broad base of public support and abide by strict spending limits?
Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Answer: "Yes"
Answer: "Yes"
Q6. Would you support a system of public financing of campaigns as in question 5 that covers all state races, including Assembly, State Senate, and statewide offices, if it were funded by an annual tax or fee of no more than $8 per California resident? *
Councilmember Evan Low (D) Councilmember Chuck Page (R)
Answer: "Yes"
Answer: "No"

"The people of California should not have to fund political campaigns."

* The wording of this question created some confusion about its intent. The intent was to ask about funding of public campaign finance for state offices with a tax or fee that averaged $8 per person, an investment in the integrity of our elections that is less than one-third of 1% of California's General Fund this year. However some candidates responded to the question as if it were proposing an additional flat tax of $8 to be paid by every Californian. Due to the confusion the wording of this question created, its answers were not scored and did not count towards the overall score for the Clean Money Survey.

Note: Candidate explanations are shown as submitted. CCMAF has not edited the candidate explanations for content or writing style.

California Clean Money Action Fund
3916 Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 208, Culver City, CA  90230.  United States.
Phone: (800) 566-3780.  Fax:(888) 633-8898.  info@CAcleanaction.org